Life expectancy for local areas of the UK: between 2001 to 2003 and 2018 to 2020

Subnational trends in the average number of years people will live beyond their current age measured by “period life expectancy”.

This is the latest release. View previous releases

Email Chris White and Michaela Rea

Release date:
23 September 2021

Next release:
To be announced

1. Main points

  • We have been able to measure the impact of coronavirus (COVID-19) on regional trends in life expectancy by including 2020 death registrations; the National Life Tables release provides further information for countries in the UK using 2020 mortality data.

  • Significant reductions in male life expectancy at birth occurred in England (7.8 weeks) and Scotland (11.0 weeks) in 2018 to 2020 compared with 2015 to 2017; in Wales, male and female life expectancy at birth saw non-significant reductions between the same periods.

  • Inclusion of 2020 mortality data caused significant reductions in male life expectancy in 2018 to 2020 compared with 2015 to 2017 in most English regions.

  • Large falls in male life expectancy at birth occurred in the North East (16.7 weeks) and Yorkshire and The Humber (16.2 weeks); for females it significantly reduced in the West Midlands (9.9 weeks), but significantly increased in the South West (17.7 weeks).

  • The continued improvement in life expectancy observed in the South West coincides with lower excess deaths and lower mortality involving COVID-19,compared with other regions of England.

  • A significant reduction in male life expectancy occurred in Hertsmere (1.9 years), but a significant increase occurred in Westminster (2.1 years); for females a significant reduction occurred in Derby (1.1 years), but a significant increase occurred in Kensington and Chelsea (1.7 years).

Back to table of contents

2. Summary of life expectancy estimates: 2018 to 2020

This bulletin updates estimates to cover the period 2018 to 2020. It will focus on life expectancy at birth, and all mention of life expectancy is at birth. Life expectancy at other ages can be found in the data tables accompanying this release.


For the most recent changes in life expectancy mentioned throughout this release, we have compared the years 2015 to 2017 and 2018 to 2020, as these are the latest non-overlapping periods that life expectancies have been estimated for.

Back to table of contents

3. Constituent country and England’s regions comparisons

At national level, male life expectancy between 2018 and 2020 was highest in England (79.4 years) and lowest in Scotland (76.8 years). Within England, sizable regional differences are present (Table 1), including a three-year gap between the North East (77.6 years) and the South East (80.6 years).

For females, country and regional differences were smaller; the pattern mirrored that for males. Between countries it was highest in England (83.1 years) and lowest in Scotland (81.0 years); between regions it was higher in the south and lower in the north and the East and West Midlands.

Figure 1: Male and female life expectancy for UK countries and most regions in England was lower in 2018 and 2020 compared with 2017 and 2019

Life expectancy at birth by sex across UK countries and regions in England, 2001 to 2003 up to 2018 to 2020

Embed code


  1. Axis does not start at 0.

Download the data

Back to table of contents

4. Change between 2015 to 2017 and 2018 to 2020

Inclusion of 2020 mortality data, containing deaths involving coronavirus (COVID-19), disrupted an improving trend in male life expectancy observed in 2017 to 2019 compared with 2014 to 2016. However, in 2018 to 2020 it significantly decreased in England (by 1.8 months) and Scotland (by 2.5 months) compared with 2015 to 2017 (Figure 2).

Male life expectancy in 2018 to 2020 saw significant decreases of two months in London and the East of England, highlighting the influence of 2020 mortality data (Figure 2). The North East and Yorkshire and The Humber saw the largest decreases of almost four months.

In contrast, the South West observed a small increase, although this was not significant.

At national level, Scotland had the largest reduction in life expectancy of 2.5 months. However, Northern Ireland had a commensurate improvement to the previous non-overlapping time period.

For females, changes were more mixed. Increases in life expectancy were observed across all regions in 2017 to 2019 compared with 2014 to 2016, five of which were significant. However, in 2018 to 2020 the five regions of the north and the East and West Midlands experienced decreases compared with 2015 to 2017; the fall significant in the West Midlands (2.3 months). The four regions of the south saw increases, with a significant improvement in the South West (Figure 3).

A reason that England’s regions faired differently in the latest non-overlapping time period was the result of COVID-19 mortality during 2020. Deaths due to COVID-19 by English region and Welsh health board shows that the South West region had lower male and female COVID-19 age-standardised mortality rates, compared with other regions during 2020, while London had substantially higher rates during the first peak of the pandemic in April 2020. The COVID-19 influence was greater for males, which is reflected in the larger number of significant decreases in male life expectancy that we report.

In addition, the difference in the number of deaths in 2020 compared with the five-year average were greater in regions that had significant falls in life expectancy. You can find out more about this difference in number of deaths in our Excess deaths in England and Wales, 2020 dataset. The South West had fewer excess deaths and a smaller proportion of its total number of deaths that involved COVID-19 than other regions in England (Figure 4). You can find out more about deaths involving COVID-19 in our Deaths due to COVID-19, registered in England and Wales: 2020 dataset.

It is important to note that while the coronavirus pandemic disrupted a largely improving trend in life expectancy, it does not necessarily mean a baby born between 2018 and 2020 will go on to live a shorter life. It is possible that life expectancy will return to an improving outlook in the future once the consequences of the pandemic for mortality trends have been appraised.

Back to table of contents

5. Life expectancy at local level

There were falls in male life expectancy in more than half of local areas, nine of which were significant (Table 2).

Those local authorities having an improvement in life expectancy between 2014 to 2016 and 2017 to 2019, such as Tower Hamlets, mostly continued to improve in 2018 to 2020, but by a smaller amount; many of those that had fallen in the earlier comparison periods, such as North Kesteven, also fell in the latest comparison period.

Gaps in male life expectancy between local areas in the UK grew from 10.0 years in 2015 to 2017 to 11.6 years in 2018 to 2020; for females, it grew from 7.8 years to 9.6 years.

Life expectancy estimates for local areas are available in the data tables accompanying this release and in the dynamic interactive tool (Figure 5).

Figure 5: Life expectancy at birth and aged 65 years by sex across local areas in the UK, between 2001 and 2003, and between 2018 and 2020

Embed code

Download the data

Back to table of contents

6. Life expectancy for local areas of the UK data

Life expectancy estimates, all ages, UK
Dataset | Released 23 September 2021
Pivot table for life expectancy by sex and area type, divided by three-year intervals starting from 2001 to 2003.

Back to table of contents

7. Glossary

Period life expectancy

The life expectancy estimates reported in this bulletin are period-based. Period life expectancy at a given age for an area is the average number of years a person would live if he or she experienced the particular area’s age-specific mortality rates for that time period throughout his or her life.

95% confidence intervals

A confidence interval is a measure of the uncertainty around a specific estimate. As intervals around estimates widen, the level of uncertainty about where the true value lies increases. At a national level, the overall level of error will be small compared with the error associated with a local area or a specific age and sex breakdown. Therefore, the widths of the confidence intervals reported in this release will have sizable differences.

Statistical significance

The term “significant” refers to statistically significant changes or differences. Significance has been determined using the 95% confidence intervals, where instances of non-overlapping confidence intervals between estimates indicate the difference is unlikely to have arisen from random fluctuation. In some circumstances, significance has also been tested using z scores.  

Back to table of contents

8. Measuring the data

This statistical bulletin presents estimates of life expectancy (the number of years people are expected to live) for the UK’s constituent countries, regions, local government administrations including combined authorities and Welsh health boards.

Please note, this release is calculated based on death registrations in the period 2018 to 2020, which includes the first wave and part of the second wave of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.

All constituent country estimates used in this bulletin are calculated using an abridged life table; this is to be consistent with local area estimates and to allow more valid local area benchmarking with national estimates. These national estimates will differ slightly from the national life tables release also published 23 September 2021, which uses a "complete" life table approach. For further details, see the article Life expectancy releases and their different uses.

Data sources

Life expectancy uses death registrations data held by the Office for National Statistics (ONS), which are compiled from information supplied when deaths are certified and registered as part of civil registration. Death registration data for Scotland and Northern Ireland are provided by the National Records of Scotland (NRS) and the Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency (NISRA) respectively. Mid-year population estimates are used in combination with death registrations to calculate mortality rates used in life tables.

Method for estimating life expectancy

The life expectancy estimates reported in this bulletin are period-based life expectancies, estimated using an abridged life table. A Health state life expectancy estimates template is available, which shows how the abridged life table is deployed to derive life expectancy estimates.

Abridged life tables are used in preference to complete life tables for smaller populations, because death counts can be too sparse for examining mortality for single years of age. These tables are also used because mid-year population estimates are not available or sufficiently reliable to produce these by single year of age.

Early access for quality assurance purposes

We provide early access for quality assurance purposes to a small number of external bodies including Public Health England, Department of Social Care, Welsh Government, National Records of Scotland, Department of Health Northern Ireland and Public Health Wales. ONS independently produces these statistics and ultimately determines the focus, content, commentary, illustration and interpretation.

More quality and methodology information is available in the Health state life expectancies, UK QMI.

Back to table of contents

9. Strengths and limitations

The strengths of the release are that:

  • it covers all UK local areas and estimates are comparable with countries and regions
  • the estimates using abridged life tables align closely with those based on complete life tables
  • the mortality data used has complete population coverage; estimates have high precision and representative of the underlying population at risk

The limitation of the release is that it is necessary to pool data over three calendar years to enable sufficiently reliable and accurate measurement of life expectancy for local areas. The scope to measure significant change in an optimally timely manner is reduced because of reliance on non-overlapping time periods.

Back to table of contents

Contact details for this Statistical bulletin

Chris White and Michaela Rea
Telephone: +44 1633 455865