1. Authors

David Takyi and Emelia D’ Silva

Back to table of contents

2. Main points

  • The sterling effective exchange rate depreciated 20% between November 2015 and October 2016, including a record 6.5% fall between June and July 2016 following the EU referendum vote.
  • This led to higher input costs for UK manufacturers due to rising prices for imported raw materials and fuels and also higher output prices for exported goods in sterling terms.
  • Experimental volume estimates suggest that while exports increased steadily from 2014, there was a 9.9 percentage point rise in the 3 month year-on-year rolling average growth rate between July 2016 and March 2017 following the EU referendum vote.
  • Estimates for export volumes compared with current price turnover suggest exporting businesses benefited from a combination of higher prices and increased volumes.
  • Large businesses were quicker to realise growth in current price turnover than small businesses, although all businesses witnessed a shift in their overall turnover towards exports.
Back to table of contents

3. Summary

This article looks at the relationship between manufacturers’ turnover, as measured in current prices by the Monthly Business Survey (MBS), export producer prices, as measured by the Export Price Index (EPI) and an experimental measure of export volumes produced for this article.

The sterling effective exchange rate depreciated 20% between November 2015 and October 2016, which includes the period of the 2016 EU referendum vote when the rate fell by a record 6.5% between June and July. This led to higher prices for exported goods when reported in sterling terms, which in turn resulted in higher turnover for exporting manufacturers, as reported in published data from the Monthly Business Survey (MBS).

The question that is unanswered from published MBS data is whether exporting manufacturers also generated an increase in sales volume, which economic theory says can occur following currency depreciation due to manufacturers being able to drop their prices in foreign currency terms to become more competitive, while maintaining their prices in sterling terms. This article suggests that once the effect of prices are removed from MBS export turnover sales, manufacturers' export volume grew 9% between Quarter 3 (July to Sept) 2016 and Quarter 2 (Apr to June) 2017, while turnover in current prices over the same period rose 11%. The increase in current price turnover seen in the published figures would therefore appear to be a combination of price and volume effects.

Some exporting manufacturers are therefore assumed to have benefited from the recent depreciation due to a combination of price and volume effects; however, what is not clear from analyses in this article is the degree to which higher input costs for imported raw materials and fuels, also a result of the depreciation, have offset any potential gains generated from exports.

Back to table of contents

4. Methods

This analysis has been completed using non-seasonally adjusted, current price (nominal) pounds data, collected through the Monthly Business Survey (MBS) and published through the Turnover in the Production and Services Industry release. Through surveying 6,000 manufacturers, the MBS covers the whole of the manufacturing industry with the exception of the iron and steel and mineral oil refining industries. Users should be aware that data used in this article differs from the UK trade in goods import and export data, which is obtained from HM Revenue and Customs.

Prices data have been sourced from export price indices and producer price indices. These sources are described more fully in the GDPO source catalogue. The experimental volume measure has been calculated as a simple deflation of current price turnover data at the three-digit industry level (SIC 2007) by the respective three-digit export and producer price indices at the product level. The data are consistent with the dataset published in the June Index of Production.

Analysis by business size has been conducted using the sampling size bands used for the MBS. Four sampling size bands are constructed using employment, with all large businesses in size band 4 selected for the survey – this threshold is typically employment of 250 or more but it can be lower for some small industries. Beneath this threshold the remaining three size bands constitute small and medium-sized businesses that are selected at random to represent business activity.

Users should note

Turnover data are collected at industry and not product level.

All volume data presented have been calculated through a simple deflation and index process. No chain linking has been used. In addition it has been assumed that the turnover of an industry only reflects the primary product of that industry. The deflation process in national accounts is more detailed and involves breaking down the output of each industry into a variety of products and deflating these with the most appropriate product deflator.

Data before January 2011 were collected on a Standard Industrial Classification 2003 (SIC 2003) basis and have since been converted to SIC 2007, thus some caution should be observed when using data at the lowest levels.

Data used for this analysis goes up to June 2017 for both prices and turnover data.

Back to table of contents

5. Impact of recent sterling depreciation on manufacturers’ imported inputs and export prices

Between November 2015 and October 2016 the value of sterling fell sharply. Over the same period, import and export prices for the UK manufacturing sector rose. Figure 1 shows the input Producer Price Index (PPI) for imported materials and fuels (Imported Inputs), Export Price Index (EPI) and the sterling effective Exchange Rate Index (ERI), which measures changes in the strength of sterling relative to a basket of other currencies. Between November 2015 and October 2016, the sterling effective exchange rate fell, which is associated with an increase in import and export prices when reported in sterling terms.

Figure 2 shows the 3-month year-on-year rolling average growth rate for the price of imported inputs, EPI and the sterling effective exchange rate. Between November 2015 and November 2016, the sterling effective exchange rate fell from 5.7% growth to a decline of 16.9%, implying a sharp fall in the value of sterling. This period coincided with the EU referendum vote, which resulted in a month-on-month fall in ERI of 6.5% between June and July 2016, which was the largest movement in the monthly rate since November 2008. Between January and June 2017, the sterling effective rate has stabilised (Figure 1), while the 3-month year-on-year rolling average comparison has moved in an upward direction due to 2016 movements falling from the annualised figures.

The impact of the depreciation on UK manufacturing prices was twofold; input costs associated with raw materials and fuel prices increased, while output prices for exported goods rose in sterling terms.

Between November 2015 and June 2017, which spanned the depreciation, growth for prices of imported inputs ranged from a decline of 13.2% to an increase of 18.9% in February 2017 (Figure 2). All else equal, a fall in the value of sterling will lead to higher costs associated with imported inputs.

The depreciation of sterling was not the only upward pressure on input prices across the period, however, as international commodity prices also recovered following two years of falling prices. The sector has also experienced domestic cost pressures. Over the past two years unit labour costs for manufacturers have grown at a faster pace than domestic output prices; for further analyses on unit labour costs see section 6 of July's Prices economic commentary.

In addition to rising costs, the depreciation has also presented some manufacturers with an opportunity, as when a currency falls in value exporters have two extreme options. They can leave their prices unchanged in foreign currency terms and capitalise from higher prices once currency is exchanged into sterling. Alternatively they can drop their prices in the importing country by the full change in the exchange rate (keeping the sterling price the same) to become more competitive internationally with the aim of increasing their sales volume. There is also a case between these extremes where some of the competitive gains from the currency depreciation could be shared between the exporting manufacturer and the importing country. This latter situation is more likely when the importing country is more price sensitive, and where there are home-produced alternatives to the imported British goods.

According to EPI, export prices for UK manufactured goods increased in sterling terms following the depreciation from November 2015 (Figure 2), suggestive that UK firms did not immediately drop the price of their goods in foreign currency terms.

At their peak in December 2016, export prices increased 12.7% year-on-year on a rolling 3-month average basis (Figure 2), while the sterling effective exchange rate fell 16.9%. Since the beginning of 2017, growth in export prices has slowed (Figure 2).

The upward impact on export prices can also be seen in export turnover sales. By construction, prices multiplied by quantity give turnover:

All else equal, if export prices in the manufacturing sector rise (in sterling terms, but not necessarily in foreign currency terms), turnover for firms will also rise. If the foreign currency price were also to rise, provided the demand (quantity) response away from the British good was not too strong (that is, the export was relatively price inelastic), turnover in sterling terms could also be expected to rise.

Figure 3 shows export turnover sales growth for the manufacturing sector as reported by the Monthly Business Survey (MBS), along with export price growth reported by EPI. Between June 2016 and June 2017, export turnover rose by an average 9.7%, while export prices rose by an average 8.6%. Following the depreciation, export turnover growth peaked at 19.1% in January 2017 when looking at a 3-month year-on-year rolling average basis, while export prices peaked at 12.7% in the 3 months to December 2016 on the same basis.

Some UK manufacturers are therefore assumed to have benefited from the recent depreciation by realising higher prices in sterling terms and therefore turnover, for exported goods; however, what is not clear from these analyses is the degree to which higher input costs for imported raw materials and fuels, also a result of the depreciation, have offset any potential gains generated from exports.

Back to table of contents

6. Current price exports

Figure 4 shows the data for 3 months on 3 months a year ago growth for total and export turnover from 2007. Growth in the inverted Exchange Rate Index (ERI) is shown as a 12-month rate.

These data show that export turnover growth has tended to be more volatile than total turnover growth and that in recent periods export performance has been stronger than the totals performance. For example, in the 3 months to January 2017 compared with the same 3 months a year ago, export turnover increased by 19.1% while total turnover increased by 8.7%.

September 2010 and July 2010 experienced the largest increase in export turnover growth of 23.2% since the start of our analysis period in 2007. We observe that total turnover growth remained significantly lower than export turnover growth during the recent period with the biggest difference being 10.5 percentage points in January 2017; this is the largest difference in the analysis period since September 2010 where the difference was 13.0 percentage points. We also observe an inverse relationship between the exchange rate and export turnover.

Back to table of contents

9. Growth rates

Figure 9 shows that volume and current price turnover tend to move together – so exporters are generating more export revenue from more export sales, not just price effects. But 2016 has shown a larger than usual price effect – more revenue is being generated by increased sterling prices (caused by the depreciation) rather than purely by volume of sales. These data show that in the 3 months to June 2017 compared with the same 3 months a year ago, the volume of export turnover growth increased by 2.7% and the value of export turnover growth increased by 9.0% during the same period.

Back to table of contents

Contact details for this Article

James Wells and Mark Stephens
Telephone: +44 (0) 1633 456387